The Women of Genesis

 

 


Table of Contents    Return to course main page    Return to library



LESSON SEVEN


THE DAUGHTERS of CANAAN
and the Other Wives of Esau

Including the Grievous Daughters-in-law

 



You are required to read the entire book of Genesis while completing this course.

 



THE DAUGHTERS of CANAAN
and the Other Wives of Esau

Including the Grievous Daughters-in-law

 

Introduction: There is much debate concerning just what was the number of the wives of Esau.  The estimates range from 3 to 5.  The debate is sparked by the biblical references giving the names and genealogy of these women.

Gen 26:34 "... Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and Bashemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite:
Gen 36:2-3 "... Adah the daughter of Elon the Hittite, and Aholibamah the daughter of Anah the daughter of Zibeon the Hivite; and Bashemath Ishmael's daughter, sister of Nebajoth.
Gen 28:9 "... Mahalath the daughter of Ishmael, Abraham's son, the sister of Nebajoth

    As can be seen, there are two mentions of a wife, or wives, named Bashemath.  One is Bashemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite; and, Bashemath, Ishmael's daughter, sister of Nebajoth.

           The possible explanations are several:
        1. The biblical account could be in error.
            (As is claimed by the opponents of the inerrancy of God's Word.)
        2. The two mentions of women named Bashemath could both be a reference to one woman
             and a lineage confused by intermarriage.  And, according to some, this also could be true
             of one other of the wives mentioned.  Which would put the number of wives at 3.
        3. It could be a reference to two different women.  Which would put the number of wives at
             4 or 5.  Five, if the other names are those of different women also; or four, if there is one
             other woman that is referred to by two different names.  (Many Jews believe that there are
             two names given to each of two of the women and, thus, place the number of wives at
             three.)


  An interesting article written by Stephen Caesar espouses one of those possible explanations.

   "The name Bashemath (correctly Basemath) probably comes from the Semitic word-stem b-s-m, meaning “fragrant” (for example, besem means “balsam” in Hebrew). When you add the Hebrew feminine ending –ath, you get Basemath, “fragrant woman.” The possibility exists that Mahalath (daughter of Ishmael and sister of Nebajoth) and Adah (daughter of Elon the Hittite) were both given the nickname “fragrant” (Douglas 1982: 124). In other words, the Bashemath, daughter of Elon, in Gen. 26:34 is the same as the Adah, daughter of Elon, in Gen. 36:2, while the Bashemath, daughter of Ishmael, in Gen. 36:3 is the same as Mahalath, daughter of Ishmael, in Gen. 28:9.

    After first marrying Judith the daughter of Beeri, Esau may have married Adah the daughter of Elon and nicknamed her “Fragrant.” The possibility exists that Adah died, whereupon he married Mahalath, daughter of Ishmael, and nicknamed her “Fragrant,” in honor of his dead wife. Another possibility is that Esau divorced Adah “the Fragrant” (which was allowed by secular Near Eastern law in the Patriarchal Era), and then married Mahalath, nicknaming her “the Fragrant” to spite Adah. Thus, Esau’s various marriages can be plausibly reconstructed as follows:

  • First wife: Judith, daughter of Beeri the Hittite
  • Second wife: Adah, “the Fragrant” (Bashemath), daughter of Elon the Hittite; deceased or divorced
  • Third wife: Mahalath, “the Fragrant” (Bashemath), daughter of Ishmael and sister of Nebajoth
  • Fourth wife: Aholibamah, granddaughter of Zibeon the Hivite


    There are at least two examples of a wife having a nickname different from her real name. The first example comes from the Mari texts, which were contemporary with the Patriarchal Era. Abraham Malamat of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem writes:

    “Some years ago I published a study (together with P. Artzi) on the most prominent of the Mari ladies—Shibtu, Zimri-Lim’s queen [Zimri-Lim was king of Mari in the time of the Patriarchs]….Until quite recently it was thought that Shibtu was the daughter of Yarim-Lim, king of Aleppo, and his chief wife, Gashera. In several documents, however, Shibtu’s mother is named as Zizi. Either Shibtu was a princess by a secondary queen at Aleppo, or it might be assumed that Zizi was Gashera’s nickname. Such nicknames were not uncommon in antiquity, and even Zimri-Lim was not immune to this phenomenon, for his family often addressed him as ‘my Star’” (Malamat 1989: 12).

   Much later, the wife of Assyrian king Sennacherib (705–681 BC) bore an Aramaic name, Naqia, and an Assyrian name, Zakutu (Boardman 1991: 138; Kuhrt 1995: 527). Thus, it is entirely possible that two of Esau’s wives were known by two different names: their names given to them at birth, Adah and Mahalath, and their identical nicknames, 'Fragrant.'"

   These are, of course, mere conjecture but they do offer possible explanations of the two biblical statements.  This view would suggest that Bashemath, daughter of Elon, and Adah, daughter of Elon, were the same woman; one name being merely what we would call a "nickname."  This would put the number of wives at 4.  However, it also suggests that another possibility exists- one of divorce and remarriage, which would put the number back at 5 again.  Both mere conjecture, at best.


    However, Jewish speculation somewhat parallels some of this same conjecture.

Article in "JEWISH WOMEN, a Comprehensive Historical Encyclopedia"
Name and author of Article: Esau, Wives of: Midrash and Aggadah
by Tamar Kadari

    "Esau married his first two wives, who were from among the daughters of Heth, against his parents’ wishes. According to the Rabbis, these women spent all their days in adultery and idolatry. Adah adorned herself with jewelry for harlotry, from which her name Adah is derived, with the meaning of the wearing [adayat] of jewelry (Gen. Rabbati, Vayishlah, p. 160). Adah’s other name was Basemath (based on the exchange of names between Gen. 26:34 and 36:2). This name also attests to her deeds, for she would perfume herself (mevasemet) for harlotry. Esau’s second wife, Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, was an illegitimate child resulting from an adulterous union (Tanhuma, Vayeshev 1). Judith was also named Oholibamah, a name she was given because she built places for idolatry (bamot). She dwelled in Esau’s tent, but “performed her needs elsewhere” (that is, she engaged in extramarital relations). In taking two wives, Esau acted the same as the men of the Flood generation, who also took two spouses: one to provide them with offspring, and the other to provide them with sexual pleasure (see Adah, the wife of Lamech).

    After Esau saw that his father Isaac had ordered Jacob not to take a wife from the daughters of Canaan, he abandoned his evil ways and married Mahalath, the daughter of his uncle Ishmael. By merit of this marriage, the Holy One, blessed be He, forgave Esau all his sins (JT Bikkurim 3:3, 65c–d). Mahalath’s name indicates that God pardoned (mahal) Esau. However, according to another view, Esau did not mend his ways and Mahalath was as evil as his first two wives Midrash Aggadah, ed. Buber, Gen. 28:9). This later marriage was also the result of negative motives: Esau plotted together with Ishmael to kill Isaac and Jacob, to marry the daughter of Ishmael, and to inherit both families. Accordingly, his marriage to Mahalath was ke-mahalah (as an affliction) and only increased the pain his parents had suffered upon his first marriages (Gen. Rabbah 67:8, 13)."

    This, of course, is also as much conjecture as the earlier theory put forth by Stephen Caesar.  The Jewish view places the number of wives at three, with two of the names in the biblical account being alternate names for two of the three wives.


    However, although all of these are mere conjecture, still, all of these are possibilities and are presented simply to show that what some call a "contradiction" in the biblical account is not one because there are multiple ways that the two accounts could be easily reconciled. 

I. The First two wives of Esau.
    A.
They were Hittites, and that means they were Canaanites.  (Gen 26:34)


        "And Esau was forty years old when he took to wife Judith the daughter
           of Beeri the Hittite, and Bashemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite:"

    B.
The Cursed Line of Canaan  (Gen 9:22-27)
    
  
The family line of Canaan was cursed because of his father, Ham.
    C. These two wives were a grief of mind to Isaac and Rebekah.  (Gen 26:35; 27:46; 28:6-8)

II. Children From the Wives Were Under the Curse Put Upon Canaan.
   
This was introduced into the family through the two Canaanite wives.



A.

 Only 3 of the wives bore male children to carry on the line.  The wives that bore were: Adah, Aholibamah, and Bashemath the daughter of Ishmael.  (Gen 36:4-5, 10, 13-14)

B.

 Because Esau married the Canaanite wives, he joined the curse to his lineage.
1. From that time down through the pages of history, the line of Esau and his wives were a curse to the descendants of Jacob (Israel), who were the chosen line.
2. The Edomites, descended from the family of Esau and his wives, were:
   a. Enemies of the line of Jacob in Num ch. 20.
   b. They slew the Lord's priests in I Sam ch. 22.
   c. Caused King Solomon's heart to turn aside after strange gods by way of his marrying Edomite wives.
   d. And gave tribulation to Jacob's descendants in many other ways.
3. The Amalekites and Agagites, the descendants of Esau and his wives, tried to destroy the entire Jewish nation through Haman in the book of Esther.

C.

The non-Canaanite wife also was under the curse because of the Canaanite connection to the family through the Canaanite wives.  And her progeny was also cursed.
  In the case of Korah son of Esau by Aholibamah, Korah waged war against Israel.

 

Summary
     
The lessons to be learned from the study of these wives, and especially the marriages to the "grievous wives," are three:
A. The results of sin affect not only all of our immediate family but also our family for generations to come.
B. The second lesson is that the blessed should NEVER intermarry with the cursed.
    The application for today is that the Christian should NEVER marry the lost.
    (II Cor 6:14-18)  It will cause trouble for generations to come and will mingle
     the curse of God with the family line because of such unholy unions.
C. The third lesson is that God is in overall control, but the disobedient and rebellious actions of men in their choice of "grievous" wives will dictate the specific details of how God carries out His will.  And such disobedience will force God's bringing of much trouble upon the disobedient one's family line.  Maybe even to the extent of His cursing it to oblivion, (Edomites- Mal 1:3-4; Amalekites- Deut 25:19) as He did in the Old Testament in order to bring about His sovereign will in protecting the blessed line.

Exo 34:7 Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children's children, unto the third and to the fourth generation.

    Of course we are under grace today, and that means that the children of the disobedient fathers always have the opportunity to be saved and escape the the curse of God- which is Hell and the Lake of Fire for the lost.  However, since the children generally follow the actions and beliefs of the parents and, in this particular case, learn disobedience and rebellion from them, then the chances that the children will obey God and turn away from the disobedience and rebellion learned from their parents and accept Christ as the payment for their sins is quite remote.  Thus, they are condemned.  And this can go on for generations before one of the children breaks the chains of disobedience and rebellion that binds them and turns back to God.  And all of the rebellion and disobedience that keeps the majority under the curse of God can be generally traced to the example set for the children by their parents.

Final conclusion:  We can condemn our posterity to lives that are under the curse of God by our
disobedience and rebellion just as surely as Esau condemned his by his disobedience and rebellion.



LESSON SEVEN TEST

Lesson test is "open book," which means you may
use your study materials while taking this test.

If you fail this test then you must wait a minimum of one day before you can
retake it.  During that time you are required to go to the textbook and the
Bible, whichever is appropriate, and find the correct answers to every
question missed on the failed test. You may use the copy of the
failed test that was sent to you and refer to it for the correct
answers, which are included on it, to verify that you have
found the correct answers in your study materials.
Once you have found all of the correct answers
and waited the required one day, then you
may retake the test. 

You cannot proceed to the next Lesson until the day after you have
passed this Lesson Test and found all of the correct answers
in the textbook or the Bible, whichever is appropriate, to
all questions missed on this test even though
you received a passing score.